Mule or Oxen?
Posted By admin on July 2, 2009
Wagons were no good without something to pull them, so the next important decision was what animals to use. Horses were expensive and were used for riding by all but the wealthy settlers. That left the choice between the mule and the ox…
Unbroken mules were quite a challenge to prepare for the task of pulling the wagon, ocassionally causing grave injury to the trainer. But, once trained, mules were sure-footed, smart, durable and quick moving. On the other hand, oxen could pull larger loads, would eat anything, and were cheaper than mules ($50 per ox as compared to $90 per mule). Oxen were also less likely to be the victim of Indian thieves or wandering off in the darkness.
On the down side, oxen were SLOW – as one settler said, they “plodded along, not walked”. Oxen could add days to an overland mountain trail. Oxen hooves were not adapted to travel over rocky mountain areas, whereas mules are known for rocky travel.
How many animals? Depending on the financial means of the family – it varied from 4 oxen and one wagon for an average family to an entire farmyard for more well-to-do families.
Now that we have our gear, our wagon and our team of animals – we are on the way west!
Next time we will be stopping for meals…yum!
I believed all these years that we just moved westward – from the Ohio Valley to the Plains and then on to the West Coast, BUT that is not the case!